Does It Mean Anything That I Was Pregnant When I Became Born Again

Belief that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit

The virgin birth of Jesus is the Christian doctrine that Jesus was conceived past his female parent, Mary, through the power of the Holy Spirit and without sexual intercourse.^[one] It is mentioned but in Matthew 1:18-25 and Luke 1:26-38,^[ii] and the modern scholarly consensus is that the narrative rests on very slender historical foundations.^[three] Christians traditionally regard it equally an explanation of the mixture of the human being and divine natures of Jesus.^{[4] [1]} Nevertheless, today at that place are many churches in which it is considered orthodox to take the virgin nascency but non heretical to deny it.^[5]

New Testament narratives: Matthew and Luke [edit]

Matthew one:18-25 [edit]

18: Now the birth of Jesus the Messiah took identify in this way. When his mother Mary had been engaged to Joseph, only before they lived together, she was found to exist with child from the Holy Spirit.
nineteen: Her husband Joseph, being a righteous human being and unwilling to expose her to public disgrace, planned to dismiss her quietly.
20: But just when he had resolved to do this, an affections of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for the child conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.
21: She will bear a son, and you are to proper name him Jesus, for he volition save his people from their sins."
22: All this took place to fulfil what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet:
23: "Look, the virgin shall conceive and comport a son, and they shall name him Emmanuel," which means, "God is with us."
24: When Joseph awoke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him; he took her as his wife,
25: but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.

Luke 1:26-38 [edit]

26: In the sixth month the affections Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth,
27: to a virgin engaged to a human whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin's proper noun was Mary.
28: And he came to her and said, "Greetings, favored i! The Lord is with you lot."
29: But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be.
30: The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you accept found favor with God.
31: And now, y'all will conceive in your womb and behave a son, and you will name him Jesus.
32: He will exist great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will requite to him the throne of his ancestor David.
33: He volition reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will exist no finish."
34: Mary said to the affections, "How can this be, since I am a virgin?"
35: The angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit volition come upon you, and the ability of the About Loftier will overshadow you lot; therefore the kid to be born will exist holy; he volition exist chosen Son of God.
36: And now, your relative Elizabeth in her former age has besides conceived a son; and this is the 6th month for her who was said to exist arid.
37: For naught will be impossible with God."
38: So Mary said, "Hither am I, the servant of the Lord; let it exist with me according to your give-and-take." And then the angel departed from her.

Texts [edit]

In the entire Christian corpus, the virgin birth is explicit merely in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke.^[2] The two concur that Mary'southward husband was named Joseph, that he was of the Davidic line, and that he played no role in Jesus'due south divine formulation, simply across this they are very different.^{[6] [7]} Matthew has no census, shepherds, or presentation in the temple, and implies that Joseph and Mary are living in Bethlehem at the fourth dimension of the birth, while Luke has no magi, flight into Egypt or massacre of the infants, and states that Joseph lives in Nazareth.^{[half dozen]}

Matthew underlines the virginity of Mary past references to the Volume of Isaiah (using the Greek translation in the Septuagint, rather than the mostly Hebrew Masoretic Text) and past his narrative statement that Joseph had no sexual relations with her until later the birth (a choice of words which leaves open the possibility that they did accept relations afterward that).^[eight] Luke introduces Mary as a virgin, describes her puzzlement at being told she volition bear a child despite her lack of sexual experience, and informs the reader that this pregnancy is to exist effected through God's Holy Spirit.^[9] The account has obvious problems: why would Mary, betrothed and about to begin life with her husband, exist puzzled at the idea that she will have a child, especially as at that place is nada in the angel's words ("you volition excogitate in your womb and bear a son") to advise that the child'southward conception volition be other than natural.

In that location is a serious debate as to whether Luke'due south nativity story is an original part of his gospel.^[10] Chapters 1 and 2 are written in a mode quite different from the rest of the gospel, and the dependence of the birth narrative on the Greek Septuagint is absent from the remainder.^[11] There are strong Lukan motifs in Luke ane–2, but differences are every bit striking—Jesus'southward identity as "son of David", for instance, is a prominent theme of the nascency narrative, but not in the residuum of the gospel.^[12] In the early role of the 2d century the gnostic theologian Marcion produced a version of Luke lacking these ii capacity, and although he is generally accused of having cut them out of a longer text more like our ain, genealogies and nativity narratives are besides absent from Marker and John.^[11]

Cultural context [edit]

Matthew i:18 says that Mary was matrimonial (engaged) to Joseph.^[13] Nether Jewish law betrothal was only possible for minors, which for girls meant aged nether twelve or prior to the first mense, whichever came outset.^[13] We tin thus have it that Mary was twelve years old or a lilliputian less, at the time of the events described in the gospels^[14] Co-ordinate to custom the hymeneals would take place twelve months after, after which the groom would take his helpmate from her father's business firm to his own.^[14] A matrimonial girl who had sex with a human being other than her hubby-to-be was considered an adulteress.^[xiv] If tried before a tribunal both she and the young man would be stoned to death, but it was possible for her betrothed husband to issue a document of repudiation, and this, co-ordinate to Matthew, was the course Joseph wished to take prior to the visitation by the affections.^[15]

The near likely cultural context for both Matthew and Luke is Jewish Christian or mixed Gentile/Jewish-Christian circles in rooted in Jewish tradition.^[16] These readers would have known that the Roman Senate had declared Julius Caesar a god and his successor Augustus to be divi filius, the Son of God before he became a god himself on his decease in AD 14; this remained the pattern for later emperors.^[17] Imperial divinity was accompanied by suitable miraculous birth stories, with Augustus being fathered by the god Apollo while his human being mother slept, and her human hubby being granted a dream in which he saw the sun rising from her womb, and inscriptions even described the news of the divine imperial birth as evangelia, the gospel.^[eighteen] The virgin nativity of Jesus was thus a straight challenge to a central merits of Roman royal theology, namely the divine formulation and descent of the emperors.^[xix]

Matthew'due south genealogy, tracing Jesus'due south Davidic descent, was intended for Jews, while his virgin birth story was intended for a Greco-Roman audience familiar with virgin birth stories and stories of women impregnated by gods.^[20] The ancient world had no agreement that male semen and female person ovum were both needed to form a fetus,^[21] making a cultural milieu conducive to miraculous birth stories.^[22] Such stories are less frequent in Judaism, but there too in that location was a widespread belief in angels and divine intervention in births.^[23] Theologically, the two accounts marker the moment when Jesus becomes the Son of God, i.eastward., at his birth, in distinction to Mark, for whom the Sonship dates from Jesus's baptism,^{[Marker one:9–13]} and Paul and the pre-Pauline Christians for whom Jesus becomes the Son only at the Resurrection or even the Second Coming.^[24]

The ancient globe had no understanding that male semen and female ovum were both needed to course a fetus; instead they thought that the male contribution in reproduction consisted of some sort of formative or generative principle, while Mary's actual fluids would provide all the matter that was needed for Jesus's bodily form, including his male sex activity.^[25] This cultural milieu was conducive to miraculous birth stories – they were common in biblical tradition going back to Abraham and Sarah (and the conception of Isaac).^[22]

Tales of virgin birth and the impregnation of mortal women by deities were well known in the 1st-century Greco-Roman world,^[26] and Second Temple Jewish works were besides capable of producing accounts of the appearances of angels and miraculous births for ancient heroes such as Melchizedek, Noah, and Moses.^[23] Luke'south virgin nascency story is a standard plot from the Jewish scriptures, equally for instance in the proclamation scenes for Isaac and for Samson, in which an angel appears and causes apprehension, the affections gives reassurance and announces the coming birth, the mother raises an objection, and the affections gives a sign.^[27] Nevertheless, "plausible sources that tell of virgin birth in areas assuredly shut to the gospels' own probable origins take proven extremely hard to demonstrate".^[28] Similarly, while it is widely accepted that at that place is a connectedness with Zoroastrian (Persian) sources underlying Matthew'southward story of the Magi (the wise men from the East) and the Star of Bethlehem, a wider claim that Zoroastrianism formed the background to the infancy narratives has not achieved acceptance.^[28]

Historicity and sources of the narratives [edit]

The mod scholarly consensus is that the doctrine of the virgin birth rests on very slender historical foundations.^[3] Both Matthew and Luke are late and anonymous compositions dating from the period Advertizing 80–100.^[29] The earliest Christian writings, the Pauline epistles, practise not contain any mention of a virgin birth and presume Jesus's full humanity, stating that he was "built-in of a woman" like whatsoever other human being and "born under the law" like any Jew.^[30] The Gospel of Mark, dating from around Advertisement lxx, we read of Jesus saying that "prophets are not without honour, except in their home town, and among their own kin, and in their ain house" – Mark 6:four), which suggests that Mark was not aware of whatever tradition of special circumstances surrounding Jesus' nascency, and while the author of the gospel of John is confident that Jesus is more than human he makes no reference to a virgin nativity to bear witness his indicate.^[31] John in fact refers twice to Jesus as the "son of Joseph," the outset time from the lips of the disciple Philip ("We have found him most whom Moses in the police force and also the prophets wrote, Jesus, son of Joseph from Nazareth" – John 1:45), the 2d from the unbelieving Jews ("Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose mother and father we know?" – John half dozen:41).^[32] These quotations, incidentally, are in direct opposition to the proposition that Jesus was, or was believed to exist, illegitimate: Philip and the Jews know that Jesus had a human father, and that father was Joseph.^[33]

This raises the question of where the authors of Matthew and Luke found their stories. Information technology is almost certain that neither was the work of an eyewitness.^{[34] [35]} In view of the many inconsistencies between them neither is likely to derive from the other, nor did they share a common source.^[2] Raymond Due east. Brown suggested in 1973 that Joseph was the source of Matthew'south account and Mary of Luke'south, just modern scholars consider this "highly unlikely" given that the stories emerged so late.^[36] It follows that the two narratives were created past the two writers, cartoon on ideas in circulation at to the lowest degree a decade before the gospels were composed, to perhaps 65-75 or fifty-fifty before.^[37]

Matthew presents the ministry of Jesus as largely the fulfilment of prophecies from the Volume of Isaiah,^[38] and Matthew 1:22-23, "All this took place to fulfil what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet: "Wait, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son...", is a reference to Isaiah seven:14, "...the Lord himself shall give you a sign: the maiden is with child and she will bear a son..."^{[39] [40]} Merely in the time of Jesus the Jews of Palestine no longer spoke Hebrew, Isaiah was translated into Greek,^[38] and Matthew uses the Greek give-and-take parthenos, which does mean virgin, for the Hebrew almah, which scholars agree signifies a girl of childbearing age without reference to virginity.^{[39] [40]} This mistranslation gave the author of Matthew the opportunity to interpret Jesus as the prophesied Immanuel, God is with us, the divine representative on earth.^[40]

Theology and development [edit]

Matthew and Luke apply the virgin birth (or more accurately the divine formulation that precedes it) to mark the moment when Jesus becomes the Son of God.^[24] This was a notable development over Marking, for whom the Sonship dates from Jesus's baptism, Marking 1:ix–13 and the earlier Christianity of Paul and the pre-Pauline Christians for whom Jesus becomes the Son at the Resurrection or fifty-fifty the 2nd Coming.^[24] The Ebionites, a Jewish Christian sect, saw Jesus equally fully human, rejected the virgin birth, and preferred to translate almah as "young woman".^[41] The 2nd century gnostic theologian Marcion besides rejected the virgin nascence, but regarded Jesus as descended fully formed from sky and having only the appearance of humanity.^[42] By virtually AD 180 Jews were telling how Jesus had been illegitimately conceived by a Roman soldier named Pantera or Pandera, whose proper name is likely a pun on parthenos, virgin.^[43] The story was still current in the Middle Ages in satirical parody of the Christian gospels called the Toledot Yeshu.^{[44] [45]} The Toledot Yeshu contains no historical facts, and was probably created as a tool for warding off conversions to Christianity.^[44]

The virgin birth was subsequently accepted by Christians equally the proof of the divinity of Jesus, but its rebuttal during and subsequently the 18th century European Enlightenment led some to redefine it as mythical, while others reaffirmed information technology in dogmatic terms.^[46] This division remains in place, although some national synods of the Catholic Church have replaced a biological understanding with the thought of "theological truth", and some evangelical theologians hold information technology to be marginal rather than indispensable to the Christian organized religion.^[46]

Celebrations and devotions [edit]

Christians gloat the formulation of Jesus on 25 March and his nascence on 25 Dec.^[47] (These dates are traditional; no one knows for certain when Jesus was born.) The Magnificat, based on Luke i:46-55 is one of 4 well known Gospel canticles: the Benedictus and the Magnificat in the first chapter, and the Gloria in Excelsis and the Nunc dimittis in the 2d affiliate of Luke, which are now an integral part of the Christian liturgical tradition.^[48] The Annunciation became an element of Marian devotions in medieval times, and by the 13th century directly references to it were widespread in French lyrics.^[49] The Eastern Orthodox Church uses the title "Ever Virgin Mary" every bit a key element of its Marian veneration, and as part of the Akathists hymns to Mary which are an integral part of its liturgy.^[50]

The doctrine is often represented in Christian fine art in terms of the annunciation to Mary by the Archangel Gabriel that she would conceive a child to be born the Son of God, and in Nativity scenes that include the figure of Salome. The Annunciation is one of the about frequently depicted scenes in Western fine art.^[51] Proclamation scenes also amount to the most frequent appearances of Gabriel in medieval art.^[52] The depiction of Joseph turning abroad in some Nativity scenes is a unimposing reference to the fatherhood of the Holy Spirit, and the virgin birth.^[53]

In Islam [edit]

The Quran acknowledges the virgin birth of Jesus.^[54] In surah 19 (Surah Maryam), the virgin Mary conceives and gives birth to Jesus, and when her people slander her, Mary does not respond except by pointing to her newborn son, Jesus, who defends his mother by miraculously speaking.^[55] The Islamic view holds that Jesus was God'southward word which he directed to Mary and a spirit created past him, moreover Jesus was supported by the Holy Spirit.^[56] The Quran follows the apocryphal gospels, and peculiarly in the Protoevangelium of James, in their accounts of the miraculous births of both Mary and her son Jesus.^[57] Surah 3:35–36, for example, follows the Protoevangelium closely when describing how the pregnant "wife of Imran" (that is, Mary's mother Anna) dedicates her unborn child to God, Mary's secluded upbringing within the Temple, and the angels who bring her food.^[58]

Gallery [edit]

• 

• 

  Eastern Orthodox Nativity delineation little changed in more than a millennium

• 

  Giotto (1267–1337): Nascence with an uninvolved Joseph but without Salome

• 

  Medieval miniature of the Nativity, c.  1350

Come across besides [edit]

• Adoptionism
• Almah
• Christology
• Denial of the virgin nativity of Jesus
• Immaculate Formulation of Mary
• Incarnation (Christianity)
• Isaiah 7:fourteen
• Perpetual virginity of Mary
• Parthenogenesis

References [edit]

Citations [edit]

1. ^ ^{a b} Carrigan 2000, p. 1359.
2. ^ ^{a b c} Hurtado 2005, p. 318.
3. ^ ^{a b} Bruner 2004, p. 37.
4. ^ Ware 1993, p. unpaginated.
5. ^ Barclay 1998, p. 55.
6. ^ ^{a b} Robinson 2009, p. 111.
7. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 99.
8. ^ Morris 1992, p. 31–32.
9. ^ Carroll 2012, p. 39.
10. ^ Zervos 2019, p. 78.
11. ^ ^{a b} BeDuhn 2015, p. 170.
12. ^ Dunn 2003, p. 341-343.
13. ^ ^{a b} Vermes 2006a, p. 216.
14. ^ ^{a b c} Vermes 2006b, p. 72.
15. ^ Vermes 2006b, p. 73.
16. ^ Hurtado 2005, p. 328.
17. ^ Hornblower & Spawforth 2014, p. 688. sfn mistake: no target: CITEREFHornblowerSpawforth2014 (assist)
18. ^ Borg 2011, p. 41-42.
19. ^ Borg 2011, p. 41.
20. ^ Lachs 1987, p. 5-6.
21. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 196.
22. ^ ^{a b} Schowalter 1993, p. 790.
23. ^ ^{a b} Casey 1991, p. 152.
24. ^ ^{a b c} Loewe 1996, p. 184.
25. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 195–196, 258.
26. ^ Lachs 1987, p. vi.
27. ^ Kodell 1992, p. 939.
28. ^ ^{a b} Welburn 2008, p. two.
29. ^ Fredriksen 2008, p. 7.
30. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 21.
31. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 23.
32. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 24.
33. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 29.
34. ^ Ho-hum & Craddock 2009, p. 12.
35. ^ Scarlet 2011, p. 13.
36. ^ Lincoln 2013, p. 144.
37. ^ Hurtado 2005, p. 318–319, 325.
38. ^ ^{a b} Barker 2001, p. 490.
39. ^ ^{a b} Sweeney 1996, p. 161.
40. ^ ^{a b c} Saldarini 2001, p. 1007.
41. ^ Paget 2010, p. 351.
42. ^ Hayes 2017, p. 152 fn.153.
43. ^ Voorst 2000, p. 117.
44. ^ ^{a b} Cook 2011, p. unpaginated.
45. ^ Evans 1998, p. 450.
46. ^ ^{a b} Kärkkäinen 2009, p. 175.
47. ^ Nothaft 2014, p. 564.
48. ^ Simpler 1990, p. 396.
49. ^ O'Sullivan 2005, p. fourteen–15.
50. ^ Peltomaa 2001, p. 127.
51. ^ Guiley 2004, p. 183.
52. ^ Ross 1996, p. 99.
53. ^ Grabar 1968, p. 130.
54. ^ Hulmes 1993, p. 640.
55. ^ Zebiri 2000.
56. ^ Saritoprak 2014, pp. 3, 6.
57. ^ Bell 2012, p. 110.
58. ^ Reynolds 2018, p. 55–56.

Bibliography [edit]

• Akyol, Mustafa (2017). The Islamic Jesus. St. Martin's Publishing Group. ISBN9781250088703.
• Barclay, William (1998). The Apostles' Creed. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN9781250088703.

Barker, Margaret (2001). "Isaiah". In Dunn, James D.Yard.; Rogerson, John (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802837110.

• BeDuhn, Jason (2015). "The New Marcion" (PDF). Forum. 3 (Fall 2015): 163–179.
• Bell, Richard (2012). The Origin of Islam in Its Christian Surround. Routledge. ISBN9781136260674.
• Borg, Marcus (2011). Jesus. SPCK.
• Brown, Raymond E. (1973). The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus. Paulist Printing. ISBN978-0809117680.
• Brown, Raymond E. (1999). The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Yale University Press. ISBN978-0300140088.
• Wearisome, M. Eugene; Craddock, Fred B. (2009). The People'southward New Testament Commentary. Westminster John Knox. ISBN9780664235925.
• Bruner, Frederick (2004). Matthew 1-12. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802811189.
• Carrigan, Henry Fifty. (2000), "Virgin Nativity", in Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.), Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible, Eerdmans, ISBN9789053565032
• Carroll, John T. (2000). "Eschatology". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9789053565032.
• Carroll, John T. (2012). Luke: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox Printing. ISBN978-0664221065.
• Casey, Maurice (1991). From Jewish Prophet to Gentile God: The Origins and Development of New Testament Christology. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN9780664227654.
• Childs, Brevard Due south (2001). Isaiah. Westminster John Knox Printing. ISBN978-0664221430.
• Chouinard, Larry (1997), Matthew, Higher Press, ISBN978-0899006284
• Collinge, William J. (2012). Historical Dictionary of Catholicism. Scarecrow Press. ISBN9780810879799.
• Coyle, Kathleen (1996), Mary in the Christian Tradition (revised ed.), Gracewing Publishing, ISBN978-0852443804
• Cook, Michael J. (2011), "Jewish Perspectives on Jesus", in Burkett, Delbert (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Jesus, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN9781444351750
• Davidson, John (2005). The Gospel Of Jesus: In Search Of His Original Teachings. Clear Press. ISBN978-1904555148.
• Deiss, Lucien (1996). Joseph, Mary, Jesus. Liturgical Printing. ISBN978-0814622551.
• Dorman, T.M. (1995). "Virgin Birth". In Bromiley, Geoffrey West. (ed.). International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Q-Z. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802837844.
• Dunn, James D.One thousand. (2003). Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, Book 1. Eerdmans.
• Erskine, Andrew (2009). A Companion to the Hellenistic World. John Wiley & Sons.
• Evans, Craig (1998), "Jesus in non-Christian Sources", in Chilton, Bruce; Evans, Craig (eds.), Studying the Historical Jesus: Evaluations of the State of Electric current Inquiry, BRILL, ISBN9004111425
• France, R.T. (2007). The Gospel of Matthew. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802825018.
• Fredriksen, Paula (2008). From Jesus to Christ: The Origins of the New Testament Images of Jesus. Yale University Press. ISBN978-0300164107.
• Grabar, André (1968). Christian Iconography: A Written report of Its Origins. Princeton University Printing. ISBN9780710062376.
• Gregg, D. Larry (2000). "Docetism". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9789053565032.
• Guiley, Rosemary (2004). The Encyclopedia of Angels. New York: Facts on File. ISBN0-8160-5023-6.
• Hayes, Andrew (2017). Justin against Marcion: Defining the Christian Philosophy. Fortress Press.
• Hendrickson, Peter A.; Jenson, Bradley C.; Lundell, Randi H. (2015). Luther and Bach on the Magnificat. Wipf and Stock. ISBN9781625641205.
• Hornblower, Simon; Spawnforth, Antony (2014). The Oxford Companion to Classical Civilization. Oxford Academy Press.
• Hulmes, Edward (1993), "Quran and the Bible, The", in Metzger, Bruce M.; Coogan, Michael David (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Bible, Oxford University Press, ISBN978-0-19-974391-9
• Hurtado, Larry (2005). Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802831675.
• Kärkkäinen, Five.-Due north (2009), "Christology", in Dyrness, William A.; Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti (eds.), Global Dictionary of Theology, InterVarsity Press, ISBN9780830878116
• Kodell, Jerome (1992). "Luke". In Karris, Robert J. (ed.). The Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Attestation, NAB. Liturgical Press. ISBN978-0814622117.
• Koester, Helmut (2000). Introduction to the New Testament: History and literature of early on Christianity. Vol. 2. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN9783110149708.
• Kugler, Robert; Hartin, Patrick (2009). An Introduction to the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802846365.
• Lachs, Samuel T. (1987). A Rabbinic Commentary of the New Attestation: the Gospels of Matthew, Marking and Luke. KTAV Publishing House. ISBN978-0881250893.
• Lincoln, Andrew (2013). Born of a Virgin?. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802869258.
• Loewe, William P. (1996). The College Student'south Introduction to Christology. Liturgical Press. ISBN9780814650189.
• Marsh, Clive; Moyise, Steve (2006). Jesus and the Gospels. A&C Black. ISBN978-0567040732.
• Marthaler, Berard Fifty. (2007). The Creed: The Apostolic Religion in Contemporary Theology. Twenty-3rd Publications. ISBN9780896225374.
• McGuckin, John Anthony (2004). The Westminster Handbook to Patristic Theology. Westminster John Knox Printing.
• Miller, John Westward. (2008). "The Miracle of Christ's Nascence". In Ellens, J. Harold (ed.). Miracles. ABC-CLIO. ISBN978-0275997236.
• Morris, Leon (1992). The Gospel According to Matthew. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0851113388.
• Nothaft, C. Philipp East. (2014). Medieval Latin Christian Texts on the Jewish Calendar: A Study with 5 Editions and Translations. Leiden: Brill. ISBN9789004274129.
• O'Sullivan, Daniel Eastward. (2005). Marian devotion in thirteenth-century French lyric. University of Toronto Press. ISBN0802038859.
• Paget, James Carleton (2010). Jews, Christians and Jewish Christians in Antiquity. Mohr Siebeck. ISBN9783161503122.
• Reddish, Mitchell (2011). An Introduction to The Gospels. Abingdon Press. ISBN9781426750083.
• Peltomaa, Leena Mari (2001). The paradigm of the Virgin Mary in the Akathistos hymn. Brill. ISBN9004120882.
• Reynolds, Gabriel Said (2018). The Qur'an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. Yale University Printing. ISBN9780300181326.
• Robinson, Bernard P. (2009). "Matthew's Nativity Stories". In Corley, Jeremy (ed.). New Perspectives on the Nativity. Bloomsbury. ISBN9780567613790.
• Ross, Leslie (1996). Medieval Art: A Topical Dictionary. Greenwood Printing. ISBN9780313293290.

Saldarini, Anthony J. (2001). "Matthew". In Dunn, James D.Yard.; Rogerson, John (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802837110.

• Saritoprak, Zeki (2014). Islam'due south Jesus. Tampa: Academy Printing of Florida. ISBN978-0-8130-4940-three.
• Satlow, Michael 50. (2018). Jewish Marriage in Artifact. Princeton University Press.
• Sawyer, West. Thomas (1990). "Mary". In Mills, Watson Eastward.; Bullard, Roger Aubrey (eds.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Printing. ISBN978-0865543737.
• Schowalter, Daniel N. (1993). "Virgin Birth of Christ". In Metzger, B.Chiliad.; Coogan, D. (eds.). The Oxford Companion to the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780199743919.
• Simpler, Steven (1990). "Hymn". In Mills, Watson Due east.; Bullard, Roger Aubrey (eds.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer Academy Press. ISBN9780865543737.
• Sweeney, Marvin A (1996). Isaiah 1–39: with an introduction to prophetic literature. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802841001.
• Turner, David L. (2008). Matthew. Baker. ISBN978-0-8010-2684-3.
• Tyson, Joseph B. (2006). Marcion and Luke-Acts: A Defining Struggle. University of South Carolina Press. ISBN9781570036507.
• Vermes, Geza (2006a). Who's Who in the Age of Jesus. Penguin United kingdom.
• Vermes, Geza (2006b). The Birth: History and Legend. Penguin UK.
• Voorst, Robert van (2000). Jesus Exterior the New Testament. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802843685.
• Wahlde, Urban von (2015). Gnosticism, Docetism, and the Judaisms of the Beginning Century. Bloomsbury. ISBN9780567656599.
• Ware, Timothy (1993). The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to Eastern Christianity. Penguin. ISBN9780141925004.
• Weaver, Rebeccah H. (2008), "Jesus in early Christianity", in Benedetto, Robert; Duke, James O (eds.), The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History: The early on, medieval, and Reformation eras, Westminster John Knox Press, ISBN978-0664224165
• Welburn, Andrew J. (2008). From a Virgin Womb: The "Apocalypse of Adam" and the Virgin Birth. BRILL. ISBN9789004163768.
• Wilson, Frank E. (1989). Organized religion and Practise. Harrisburg, PA: Church Publishing, Inc. ISBN9780819224576.
• Zebiri, Kate (March 2000). "Gimmicky Muslim Understanding of the Miracles of Jesus". The Muslim World. ninety (1–2): 71–90. doi:x.1111/j.1478-1913.2000.tb03682.x.
• Zervos, George (2019). The Protevangelium of James. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 79.

hartsellmorsitens.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus

Share this post